<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fast vs Big</title>
	<atom:link href="http://latentfuture.com/2008/12/05/fast-vs-big/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://latentfuture.com/2008/12/05/fast-vs-big/</link>
	<description>Strategy and Marketing for Startups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier Russo</title>
		<link>http://latentfuture.com/2008/12/05/fast-vs-big/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xavier Russo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latentfuture.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/fast-vs-big/#comment-12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks! Wish I could claim &quot;economies of speed&quot; but it looks like at least IBM got there first .. including &lt;a href=&quot;http://systemicbusiness.org/pubs/2001_IBM_ABI_Scale_Scope_Speed.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; this presentation &lt;/a&gt; way back in 2001. And I imagine economists have been talking about it for much longer than that. Nonetheless, you don&#039;t hear nearly as much these days about the impact on a firm&#039;s economics of &quot;speed&quot;, compared to &quot;scale&quot; or &quot;scope&quot;. A reminder that big is not necessarily better than fast can&#039;t hurt!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Wish I could claim &quot;economies of speed&quot; but it looks like at least IBM got there first .. including <a href="http://systemicbusiness.org/pubs/2001_IBM_ABI_Scale_Scope_Speed.pdf" rel="nofollow"> this presentation </a> way back in 2001. And I imagine economists have been talking about it for much longer than that. Nonetheless, you don&#8217;t hear nearly as much these days about the impact on a firm&#8217;s economics of &quot;speed&quot;, compared to &quot;scale&quot; or &quot;scope&quot;. A reminder that big is not necessarily better than fast can&#8217;t hurt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howley76</title>
		<link>http://latentfuture.com/2008/12/05/fast-vs-big/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[howley76]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latentfuture.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/fast-vs-big/#comment-11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the phrase &quot;Economy of Speed&quot;.  A quick google search suggests that you may have coined the phrase, at least as a juxtaposition to &quot;Economy of Scale&quot;.It has however already been used in articles on tri-athletes and narcotics!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the phrase &quot;Economy of Speed&quot;.  A quick google search suggests that you may have coined the phrase, at least as a juxtaposition to &quot;Economy of Scale&quot;.It has however already been used in articles on tri-athletes and narcotics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

